Re: another Auth-class

On Tue, 30 Oct 2001 18:22:54 +0100, Wolfram Kriesing wrote: >> > in a different way than PEAR::DB. I think PEAR::DB is a concept >> > that rocks. Any reasons for not implementing this in your >> > Auth-class? >> >> PEAR::Auth uses PEAR::DB, so what's the problem? >sorry, didnt mean to offend you Well, I felt a bit upset, because I got the impression, that you wanted to say, that PEAR::Auth doesn't support PEAR::DB. But I think I misread your posting - sorry for that. >no problem, just a different concept i guess and i was just straight >sticking to how PEAR::DB was implemented, since i liked it I chose the same approach than the one that is used for the storage containers of the PEAR cache: There are simple classes, which PEAR::Auth talks to. This classes connect to a database, open a file, connect to LDAP or communicate with the PEAR::DB interface. >do you then think my auto-auth feature makes sense? Right now I don't have the time to step deep into your code. But I'll look at it later this week (probably thursday or at least on friday). But basically I must say that your auto-auth concept sounds pretty interesting. - Martin