Re: [PEPr] Comment on Configuration::Config_Registry

From: Date: Sun, 01 Feb 2004 23:17:05 +0000
Subject: Re: [PEPr] Comment on Configuration::Config_Registry
References: 1  Groups: php.pear.dev 
Request: Send a blank email to pear-dev+get-25401@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message
On 2 Feb 2004 at 0:13, Jan Schneider wrote: > Zitat von Stefan Neufeind <stefan@neufeind.net>: > > > On 2 Feb 2004 at 7:02, Alan Knowles wrote: > > > >> Can you check the licence, - Was the Horde version LGPL or GPL? > >> > >> Regards > >> Alan > >> > >> PEPr wrote: > >> > >> >Laurent Laville (http://pear.php.net/user/farell) has commented on > >> >the proposal for Configuration::Config_Registry. > > [...] > > > > Otherwise ask the author of the horde source to distribute it under > > the PHP license in our case. > > That's not possible, but Horde is LGPL, so don't bother. I meant asking the author of that particular part of code for the permission to use a different license. Can't he decide such things afterwards? Did he donate the code to LGPL and can't decide to somehow "dual-license" his snippet of code, so it might become available under a different licence? I just wonder, what if people use PHP License in a pear-package and include some lines of LGPL- code? A bit weird in my eyes ... Stefan

« previous php.pear.dev (#25401) next »