Re: [PEPr] Comment on Configuration::Config_Registry

On 2 Feb 2004 at 0:24, Pierre-Alain Joye wrote: > On Mon, 02 Feb 2004 00:17:05 +0100 > "Stefan Neufeind" <stefan@neufeind.net> wrote: > > > I meant asking the author of that particular part of code for the > > permission to use a different license. Can't he decide such things > > afterwards? Did he donate the code to LGPL and can't decide to > > somehow "dual-license" his snippet of code, so it might become > > available under a different licence? I just wonder, what if people > > use PHP License in a pear-package and include some lines of LGPL- > > code? A bit weird in my eyes ... > > All that sounds a bit weird to me. Why not ask to release this horde > module through PEAR if it is not dependent of other non pear package? > Note it's only a question, I do not know this module :) Don't know it either, Pierre. But as far as I got the discussion only a certain amount of functionality has been taken and put into the Configuration-package. So your proposal seems a bit odd in this case ... but nevermind. Best wishes Stefan