Re: [PEPr] Comment on Configuration::Config_Registry
| From: | Pierre-Alain Joye | Date: | Sun, 01 Feb 2004 23:24:55 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: [PEPr] Comment on Configuration::Config_Registry | ||
| References: | 1 2 | Groups: | php.pear.dev |
| Request: | Send a blank email to pear-dev+get-25403@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
On Mon, 02 Feb 2004 00:17:05 +0100
"Stefan Neufeind" <stefan@neufeind.net> wrote:
> I meant asking the author of that particular part of code for the
> permission to use a different license. Can't he decide such things
> afterwards? Did he donate the code to LGPL and can't decide to
> somehow "dual-license" his snippet of code, so it might become
> available under a different licence? I just wonder, what if people
> use PHP License in a pear-package and include some lines of LGPL-
> code? A bit weird in my eyes ...
All that sounds a bit weird to me. Why not ask to release this horde
module through PEAR if it is not dependent of other non pear package?
Note it's only a question, I do not know this module :)
pierre