Re: [PEPr] Comment on Configuration::Config_Registry

Quoting Stefan Neufeind <stefan@neufeind.net>: > On 2 Feb 2004 at 0:24, Pierre-Alain Joye wrote: > > > On Mon, 02 Feb 2004 00:17:05 +0100 > > "Stefan Neufeind" <stefan@neufeind.net> wrote: > > > > > I meant asking the author of that particular part of code for the > > > permission to use a different license. Can't he decide such things > > > afterwards? Did he donate the code to LGPL and can't decide to > > > somehow "dual-license" his snippet of code, so it might become > > > available under a different licence? I just wonder, what if people > > > use PHP License in a pear-package and include some lines of LGPL- > > > code? A bit weird in my eyes ... > > > > All that sounds a bit weird to me. Why not ask to release this horde > > module through PEAR if it is not dependent of other non pear package? > > Note it's only a question, I do not know this module :) > > Don't know it either, Pierre. But as far as I got the discussion only > a certain amount of functionality has been taken and put into the > Configuration-package. So your proposal seems a bit odd in this case > ... but nevermind. http://cvsweb.horde.org/cvs.php/horde/lib/Registry.php fyi... -- Marko Djukic Horde Project (http://horde.org)