Re: Removing lead maintainers
| From: | David Costa | Date: | Fri, 27 Feb 2004 17:31:58 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: Removing lead maintainers | ||
| References: | 1 | Groups: | php.pear.dev php.pear.qa |
| Request: | Send a blank email to pear-dev+get-25938@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
On Feb 26, 2004, at 4:04 PM, Klaus Guenther wrote:
snip
There are, of course, situations in which this may be seen as especially negative. For example, if QA would "adopt" a package because the maintainer went missing, and the maintainer did not give permission to do anything. In that case, it would cause (at least) irritation, and we don't need it.Hello, just a question, would it be helpful to have a list of "abandoned" or not so active packages by matching the number of opened/uncommented bugs ? I could try to help out if necessary. Regards, David Costa, PostgreSQL Advocate http://dotgeek.org david at postgresql ddoot org gurugeek att php dot net $dsn = 'pgsql://world:most_advanced@localhost/open_source_database';