Re: [PEPr] Call for votes on Authentication::Auth_HTTP_Digest

From that point of view I'm also in favor of adding it to the existing Auth_HTTP-package somehow (maybe with a slight API- modification to that package, where possible) so we don't create unnecessarily much packages. And when one day subpackages have found a way into PEAR (really hope so) then it would be a simple thing to move digest auth to a separate subpackage. My 2 cents ... Stefan On 27 Feb 2004 at 9:17, Greg Beaver wrote: > It could always be a subpackage when that is implemented in the > installer. > > Greg > > Rui Hirokawa wrote: > > > I believe the different package is better than the unified package > > because Digest Authentication is much more complex than Basic > > Authentication and the design of both packages are quite different. > > > > Rui > > > > On Fri, 27 Feb 2004 14:46:23 +0100 > > Martin Jansen <mj@php.net> wrote: > > > > > >>On Fri Feb 27, 2004 at 01:3300PM -0000, PEPr wrote: > >> > >>>Rui Hirokawa (http://pear.php.net/user/hirokawa) has initiated the > >>>call for votes on the package Authentication::Auth_HTTP_Digest. > >> > >>I may have missed the initial discussion about that, but is there > >>any way to integrate this into Auth_HTTP instead of putting this > >>stuff in an independent package?