RE: [PEAR-DEV] XML_Functions
| From: | Jon Wood | Date: | Thu, 01 Apr 2004 14:23:06 +0000 |
| Subject: | RE: [PEAR-DEV] XML_Functions | ||
| References: | 1 2 | Groups: | php.pear.dev |
| Request: | Send a blank email to pear-dev+get-26930@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
On Thu, 2004-04-01 at 10:03 +0200, Guillaume Lecanu wrote:
> Le jeu 01/04/2004 à 09:50, Stephan Schmidt a écrit :
> > Hi,
> >
> > > If i suggest an HTML_Functions which extends the XML_Functions for
> > > controls tags/attrib (and warns), do you think this package
> > > will be more
> > > usefull ?
> >
> > I always create my HTML pages from templates, so I'm the wrong person to
> > ask...
> I see, but many people like me, have stop to use templates for make
> directly a valid XHTML page with CSS.
>
> For all my projects (and also in my company), we doesn't use templates
> now, we uses only valid XHTML/CSS way.
> IMHO, the best way is to make bloc div and make the visuel position with
> CSS. All templates can be replaced by valid XHTML/CSS and respect the
> W3C standards (ex: not use table for positioning elements in the page)
>
Templates can still be useful in that sort of situation - I'm developing
an XHTML/CSS based site, and still use templates, since a large chunk of
each page is the same, and I'm working with designers who'd rather not
futz about with arrays to build the pages.
>
> > As no one took part in this discussion, you shpuld prepare the package
> > and propose it on Pepr.
> I will make a HTML_Functions which extends the XML_Functions with
> control of tags/attributes. And after i will propose them on Pepr.
>
> Some people seem to be interested by this way (cf. the post of Alan
> Knowles "Re: [PEAR-DEV] Prefix function name problem")
>
> Thanks
>
> --
> PEAR Development Mailing List (http://pear.php.net/)
> To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php