Re: [PEPr] Comment on QA::Core_Team_Vote

On Fri, 21 May 2004 23:11:31 +0200 klaus@capitalfocus.org (Klaus Guenther) wrote: > This of course does not mean that they must have a package in > PEAR. Well, should help... for this core team. > So... Currently we have a large number in Europe (Lukas, Stephan, > Stefan, Toby, Arnaud and myself), with Helgi a few hours off, > and Carlos in Brazil. We need to try for some diversity here. Fully agreed > I'd like to reiterate here: if someone doesn't make the core team, > it does not mean that they can't help with QA. This is merely the > people with responsibility, those who get in trouble if there is a > problem. ;-) In converse, if you want to help with QA, you don't > have to try to join the core team. In fact, you probably > *shouldn't*. The non-core QA team members will merely not have > extended karma (and therefore less responsibility), but they still > are just as vital to QA as the core team. Read the RFC if in > doubt. I agree here too. However, my concern was more about who is in than who is out. Keeping in mind the karma and related responsalities. Being in this team without having done QA jobs in the past sounds bad to me. That's a valid concern as well. I'm talking about "real" QA jobs, like you, Stefan, David or Davey did. Those who did nothing should, imho, not be in (core). --Pierre