Re: Mail_IMAP 2.0.0 alpha 1

On Tue, 06 Jul 2004 17:00:02 +0200, Lukas Smith <smith@backendmedia.com> wrote: > Pierre-Alain Joye wrote: > > > On Tue, 6 Jul 2004 15:00:56 +0200 (CEST) > > tobias@schlitt.info (Tobias Schlitt) wrote: > > > > > >>As said before, I agree with your argumentation, but I still > >>insist on forcing people to a common error handling method (let it > >>be PEAR exceptions), to keep our usability level. > > > > > > Am I the only one thinking that Exceptions are a specific > > """Error""" (let add as many quotes as you like) but an > > Error is not > > an Exception?? > > > > Thinking about having Exceptions raising everywhere sounds like my > > next biggest nightmare in PEAR ;-) > > You are not alone. However it seems "we" are alone :-) > The trend seems to be unstoppable. So I guess we need to adjust or move on. > Yes, it does seem we are alone. I have seen maybe 2 messages in support of Errors. Everyone else says to use Exceptions for everything....even though Exceptions are *not meant for error handling*! -- DB_DataObject_FormBuilder - The database at your fingertips http://pear.php.net/package/DB_DataObject_FormBuilder paperCrane --Justin Patrin--