Re: Mail_IMAP 2.0.0 alpha 1
| From: | Greg Beaver | Date: | Wed, 07 Jul 2004 00:12:43 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: Mail_IMAP 2.0.0 alpha 1 | ||
| References: | 1 2 3 | Groups: | php.pear.dev |
| Request: | Send a blank email to pear-dev+get-31686@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
David Costa wrote:
snipNo need to choose - the *point* of PEAR_ErrorStack is to co-exist with exceptions and provide some functionality that exceptions lack, while providing a smooth transition from PHP4 to PHP5. PEAR_Exception is php5-only, obviously. PEAR_ErrorStack allows packages to MAINTAIN BC with PEAR_Error OR use exceptions WITHOUT A REWRITE. Combining the two packages into something that accomplishes both goals is a good answer to this problem. Pardon my french: let's cut the either/or bullshit right now. I will only say this once. This is the last message I will send regarding basic PEAR_ErrorStack functionality or usefulness. Anybody who wishes to start a polemical war MUST reference specific line numbers in the code for me to pay any attention in the future. Thank you, Greg@Greg: Do you think you could port PEAR_ErrorStack to php5 sometime very soon so that devs can develop E_STRICT packages using PEAR_ErrorStack? I think it's about time for an error handling RFC...just jumping into this, I don't think we should force errorStack vs exceptions in PHP 5.