[PEPr] Comment on Networking::Monitor
| From: | bertrand Gugger | Date: | Sat, 11 Dec 2004 12:22:51 +0000 |
| Subject: | [PEPr] Comment on Networking::Monitor | ||
| References: | 1 | Groups: | php.pear.dev |
| Request: | Send a blank email to pear-dev+get-35010@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
bertrand Gugger (http://pear.php.net/user/toggg) has commented on the proposal for
Networking::Monitor.
Comment:
** Users dedicaced **
The alert system should be dedicaced to users alerted.
Not have whole alerts sent to all users.
Alert systems in organizations, web or industry, *must* dispatch to given
team.
If some "free" enterprise likes to propose a "free" web watching service
and alert, then it *can only* be user dedicaced.
As the package organizes the stuff, to do that, the alarm must be run for
each combination of users/service and then, a user can get many messages.
** Associated message **
The message associated with the status is a good help, e.g. HTTP 404 can
significate a lot of things and it's some more info from the back package
to give a message.
As the message is stored but won't give a new alert a difference can exist
between the server storage and what alert was sent.
So 1) the message could depends on the state (1 state <=> 1 message).
OR 2) an option could raise alert if only message changes.
Surely it's to be studied with the language interpretation...
Anyway such a package can have a great future !
Proposal information:
http://pear.php.net/pepr/pepr-proposal-show.php?id=171
--
Sent by PEPr, the automatic proposal system at http://pear.php.net