Re: [PEPr] Comment on Networking::Monitor

On 11 Dec 2004 12:22:51 -0000, bertrand Gugger <bertrand@toggg.com> wrote: > > bertrand Gugger (http://pear.php.net/user/toggg) has commented on the proposal for > Networking::Monitor. > > Comment: > > ** Users dedicaced ** > > The alert system should be dedicaced to users alerted. > > Not have whole alerts sent to all users. > > Alert systems in organizations, web or industry, *must* dispatch to given > team. > > If some "free" enterprise likes to propose a "free" web watching service > and alert, then it *can only* be user dedicaced. > > As the package organizes the stuff, to do that, the alarm must be run for > each combination of users/service and then, a user can get many messages. > *What the heck* are you talking about? Please explain this in more plain English, I have no idea what you mean by any of this. > ** Associated message ** > > The message associated with the status is a good help, e.g. HTTP 404 can > significate a lot of things and it's some more info from the back package > to give a message. > > As the message is stored but won't give a new alert a difference can exist > between the server storage and what alert was sent. > > So 1) the message could depends on the state (1 state <=> 1 message). > > OR 2) an option could raise alert if only message changes. It was my understanding that it could *already* be configured to send a message for everey run witht he status of a service *or* send a message only when the service's status changes. > > Surely it's to be studied with the language interpretation... > > Anyway such a package can have a great future ! > > Proposal information: > http://pear.php.net/pepr/pepr-proposal-show.php?id=171 > -- Justin Patrin