Re: [PEPr] +1 for Images::XBM
| From: | Philippe Jausions | Date: | Wed, 02 Mar 2005 16:33:04 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: [PEPr] +1 for Images::XBM | ||
| References: | 1 2 3 | Groups: | php.pear.dev |
| Request: | Send a blank email to pear-dev+get-36472@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
Evgeny Stepanischev wrote:
PJ> Philippe Jausions (http://pear.php.net/user/jausions) has PJ> voted +1 on the proposal for Images::XBM. PJ> This vote is conditional. The condition is: PJ> - Most methods name start with "image". I would recommend to PJ> drop that. It just take longer to type. PJ> - Some method name change recommendationUnless a lot of people wish to see the name changes I proposed, don't bother changing them for now then... -PhilippePJ> + imageSX -> getWidth PJ> + imageSY -> getHeight PJ> + imageLine -> drawLine (and the like drawRectangle, drawEllipse...) PJ> + imageSetPixel -> setPixel (or drawPixel for consistency) PJ> + imageColorAt -> getColorAt PJ> + imageXBM -> output PJ> + imageCreateFromXBM -> createFromFile Names of methods coincide with GD module names.So it will be easier to user than them to remember. Ok, I see your point. However, when/if GD extension gets a OO implementaion, I doubt that it will keep the "image" prefix used in procedural context... I won't hold it against you ;-)