Re: Re: [PEPr] +1 for Images::XBM
| From: | Justin Patrin | Date: | Wed, 02 Mar 2005 19:38:45 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: Re: [PEPr] +1 for Images::XBM | ||
| References: | 1 2 3 4 5 | Groups: | php.pear.dev |
| Request: | Send a blank email to pear-dev+get-36488@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
On Wed, 2 Mar 2005 20:04:56 +0100, Pierre-Alain Joye <pierre@dotgeek.org> wrote:
> On Wed, 02 Mar 2005 11:33:04 -0500
> Philippe.Jausions@11abacus.com (Philippe Jausions) wrote:
>
> > Ok, I see your point. However, when/if GD extension gets a OO
> > implementaion, I doubt that it will keep the "image" prefix used
> > in procedural context... I won't hold it against you ;-)
>
> For the record, GD will never get a OO interface.
>
And so PEAR has to provide it. ;-) In which case we would still want
to rename the functions to not have the prefix and actually say what
they do.
--
Justin Patrin