Re: [PEPr] +1 for Images::XBM

Hi Philippe Jausions, you wrote: > Evgeny Stepanischev wrote: >> Names of methods coincide with GD module names. So it will be >> easier to user than them to remember. >> > Ok, I see your point. However, when/if GD extension gets a OO > implementaion, I doubt that it will keep the "image" prefix used > in procedural context... I won't hold it against you ;-) > > Unless a lot of people wish to see the name changes I proposed, > don't bother changing them for now then... Of course that names should be changed as you suggested -- I can hardly remember a discussion about a similar issue with another Image package (I'm sure there was one). $image->imageSX() is just odd... Regards, -- Michael - < mike(@)php.net >

Attachment: [application/pgp-signature] OpenPGP digital signature signature.asc