Re: Re: [PEPr] -1 for XML::XML_RPC2

Justin Patrin wrote: > Why not HTTP_Request? It's in PEAR, after all, and it the PEAR > standard for making HTTP requests. It also allows people to use the > package who don't have / don't want curl. a) It's not E_STRICT compliant. b) It's exceedingly simple to do what I want with cURL (i.e. way more simple than converting HTTP_Request to PHP5). > Of course, is also seems that a new backend could be written for your > package to use HTTP_Request rather than curl. This is a good thing and > I'd personally like to see it in the package. An extension based (xmlrpci, for example) backend would also avoid cURL and provide other advantages (performance, namely) > -- Sérgio Carvalho AIM: SergioSGC / ICQ: 67512780