Re: Re: [PEPr] +1 for XML::XML_RPC2

From: Date: Thu, 12 May 2005 18:30:12 +0000
Subject: Re: Re: [PEPr] +1 for XML::XML_RPC2
References: 1 2 3 4  Groups: php.pear.dev 
Request: Send a blank email to pear-dev+get-37598@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message
Joshua Eichorn wrote: > It would be good to see the benchmarks, but this is also an area where > im not sure that huge api differences from say ext/xmlrpci or etc/soap > makes a lot of sense. I would imagine an additive approach ontop of say > the same very simple api as etc/SOAP would be great. I've posted some benchmarks today in a separate post, dedicated to debunking the dogma of require_once cost. As for the API, bot extensions fail to use PHP5's catchall methods. You end up doing something like: $proxy->call('methodName', [params]) when XML_RPC2 uses the catchall to create a transparent proxy. Remote method calls are just like local ones: $proxy->methodName([params]) Neither API leverages docblock documentation for introspection. -- Sérgio Carvalho

« previous php.pear.dev (#37598) next »