Re: Pear Comitee

Lukas Smith wrote: > > Well the important thing is to keep whatever method used to "rate" the > vote or better the units counted transparent to the voter. > > So the interface should output whatever methods used. > > The danger of making the system too complex is obviously that people > will feel a bit "tricked" by the system because they might not > understand why their votes only counts so and so many units. Well my explanation in poor english could sound complex, but the idea is very simple: a vote will count more when the voter is more involved in PEAR and when the voter will review the proposal deeper. This is: when you more know your decisions more wise should be. > Your methods seems very complete ... but maybe a bit overpowering as > well? Perhaps, but I didn't want to propose a system that could sound like phpnuke polls ;-). > Anyways it would definitely help the contributor minitor more easily how > people feel about her/his contribution. > Then guys? Should I forget this idea or there is more people interested in? Tomas V.V.Cox