Re: Re[2]: [PEAR-DEV] Translations (was Re: [PEAR-DEV] Pear Comitee)
| From: | Pierre-Alain Joye | Date: | Wed, 09 Jan 2002 19:24:05 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: Re[2]: [PEAR-DEV] Translations (was Re: [PEAR-DEV] Pear Comitee) | ||
| References: | 1 2 3 4 5 6 | Groups: | php.pear.dev |
| Request: | Send a blank email to pear-dev+get-3877@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
On 09 Jan 2002 19:47:55 +0100
Marcel Beerta <marcel@beerta.de> wrote:
> Because english is the most common language, i think that every
> documentation should have to be in english first.
I considerer this fact as an elite point of view :). Let the people write documentation in their
native langage (if their cannot write in english), and translate in a second step will populate
contributions.
> This would help the translators of other languages, too.
As far as we get an english (or whatever langages) few days/weeks after the release, no prob.
> I'm not very familar with french and I would translate stuff into
> german, so I had to wait for the translation of french to english, and
> then it could be translated into german which would increase the waiting
> time for the german ppl... just my 0,02$
Currently working from good german tutorials... to frech :), next english. Just easier to translate
to french in a first step :))).
We just don t have to lost the goal, get a usefull documentation, and as soon as possible, for every
langages used by php users.
The only problem I see is the release process of pear, and the frequent updates. Maybe a release
process will help to write documentations correctly and make the endusers life easier with
production applications. I m always afraid to upgrade a library so often in a production system
;;)).
pa