RE: [PEAR-DEV] Pear Comitee

It must be kept light less we fall into bureaucracy ;)) BTW, would the comitee be in charge of coordinatijng the documentation effort (including translations, etc.) ? That would certainly help > Lukas Smith wrote: > > > > Well the important thing is to keep whatever method used to > "rate" the > > vote or better the units counted transparent to the voter. > > > > So the interface should output whatever methods used. > > > > The danger of making the system too complex is obviously that people > > will feel a bit "tricked" by the system because they might not > > understand why their votes only counts so and so many units. > > Well my explanation in poor english could sound complex, but > the idea is > very simple: a vote will count more when the voter is more involved in > PEAR and when the voter will review the proposal deeper. > This is: when > you more know your decisions more wise should be. > > > Your methods seems very complete ... but maybe a bit overpowering as > > well? > > Perhaps, but I didn't want to propose a system that could sound like > phpnuke polls ;-). > > > Anyways it would definitely help the contributor minitor > more easily how > > people feel about her/his contribution. > > > > Then guys? Should I forget this idea or there is more people > interested > in? > > > Tomas V.V.Cox > > -- > PEAR Development Mailing List (http://pear.php.net/) > To unsubscribe, e-mail: pear-dev-unsubscribe@lists.php.net > For additional commands, e-mail: pear-dev-help@lists.php.net > To contact the list administrators, e-mail: > php-list-admin@lists.php.net >