Re: [PEPr] Comment on Authentication::NTLMProxy
| From: | Pierre | Date: | Mon, 26 Jun 2006 19:39:03 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: [PEPr] Comment on Authentication::NTLMProxy | ||
| References: | 1 2 | Groups: | php.pear.dev |
| Request: | Send a blank email to pear-dev+get-43121@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
Hello,
On 26 Jun 2006 17:42:31 -0000
Philippe.Jausions@11abacus.com ("Philippe Jausions") wrote:
>
> Philippe Jausions (http://pear.php.net/user/jausions) has commented
> on the proposal for Authentication::NTLMProxy.
>
> Comment:
>
> Name doesn't seem right... HTTP_Proxy_Auth_NTLM ?
It does use HTTP as part as the process with the browser (if it
supports ntlm), I would go with Auth_NTLM_HTTP then.
> There's another NTLM proposal in PEPr, in draft status, you may want
> to check with that maintainer.
Well, this one is working *very* well. I used it a lot (with Thorsten),
It is a good idea to start changing a lot of things in there now.
> Anyway to integrate with HTTP_Request, or HTTP_Client, Net_Socket and
> so on...? (I know there might be a problem with the Keep-Alive...)
Not really.
> I think there's a need to split package into HTTP_Proxy with pluggable
> authentication modules instead (NTLM being one of them.)
It is not a HTTP proxy, not directly.
> Use URLs instead of ip, server, path.
>
> Does this work good without PHP being mod_php in Apache?
Yes
-- Pierre