[PEPr] Comment on Authentication::NTLMProxy
| From: | Thorsten Rinne | Date: | Mon, 26 Jun 2006 20:17:02 +0000 |
| Subject: | [PEPr] Comment on Authentication::NTLMProxy | ||
| References: | 1 | Groups: | php.pear.dev |
| Request: | Send a blank email to pear-dev+get-43122@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
Thorsten Rinne (http://pear.php.net/user/thorstenr) has commented on the proposal for
Authentication::NTLMProxy.
Comment:
Hi Philippe,
> Name doesn't seem right... HTTP_Proxy_Auth_NTLM ?
ouch... I like the short name NTLMProxy. :-)
> There's another NTLM proposal in PEPr, in draft status, you may want to
> check with that maintainer.
yes, but I think this is about authentication, the proposed class does not
authenticate, it's just a proxy.
> Anyway to integrate with HTTP_Request, or HTTP_Client, Net_Socket and
so
> on...? (I know there might be a problem with the Keep-Alive...)
I do not think this will work due to Keep-Alive...
> I think there's a need to split package into HTTP_Proxy with pluggable
> authentication modules instead (NTLM being one of them.)
This is a nice idea... :-)
> Try to avoid all the sprintf(). Use ' (single quotes) and concatenation
> instead.
Is there a reason for not using sprintf?
> Use URLs instead of ip, server, path.
I use IP, Server and path to have the possibility to set various stages
like development, testing and production environments.
> Does this work good without PHP being mod_php in Apache?
no, sorry, because of Keep-Alive.
-Thorsten
Proposal information:
http://pear.php.net/pepr/pepr-proposal-show.php?id=396
--
Sent by PEPr, the automatic proposal system at http://pear.php.net