Re: [PEPr] Comment on Authentication::NTLMProxy
| From: | Justin Patrin | Date: | Tue, 27 Jun 2006 20:43:25 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: [PEPr] Comment on Authentication::NTLMProxy | ||
| References: | 1 2 3 | Groups: | php.pear.dev |
| Request: | Send a blank email to pear-dev+get-43160@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
On 6/27/06, Pierre <pierre.php@gmail.com> wrote:
Hello, On 27 Jun 2006 18:54:13 -0000, Justin Patrin <papercrane@reversefold.com> wrote: You need to explain this in more detail. The script should be able to exit on its own, shoudl it not? If you write your code to return instead of die then the calling script can end and nothing untoward shoudl happen.That won't help. What I'm saying has nothing to do with NTLM. Here are my questions: What is the difference between die() and the script ending normally? What is the difference between exit(0) and the script ending normally? -- Justin PatrinThe exit() calls are needed during the NTLM handshake.You keep saying this but never explain why. Why should this be needed? Why won't letting the script end normally work? I really suggest to read the (nearly non existent) specs about NTLM.