Re: PEAR installer and the PHP dep
| From: | Brett Bieber | Date: | Mon, 28 Jul 2008 17:08:00 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: PEAR installer and the PHP dep | ||
| References: | 1 2 3 4 5 | Groups: | php.pear.dev |
| Request: | Send a blank email to pear-dev+get-50477@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
On Mon, Jul 28, 2008 at 11:28 AM, Helgi Þormar Þorbjörnsson
<helgith@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 28, 2008 at 4:18 PM, Brett Bieber <brett.bieber@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Eh, this would be one I would classify as, not good enough. It's the
>> "a lot of issues" part that I think should be documented. -- not
>> official documentation per-se, but aired out in public somewhere.
>>
>>> for 4.3 -> 4.4 I have no simple answer since it's one of those just
>>> because, PEAR runs fine on 4.3 but not actively tested on it but we do
>>> need to nudge users forward and well memory corruption issues ... 4.4
>>> fixed that ;) hehe
>>
>> Hmm, now I'm thinking of Yahoo's graded browser support page ---
>>
>> http://developer.yahoo.com/yui/articles/gbs/index.html
>>
>> A = 5.2, 4.4 etc etc. Known working - fully supported.
>> B = 5.1
>> X = 5.0, 4.3, 6.0 unknown/unexpected, don't expect us to respond to
>> any bug reports on these versions
>>
>> That way we could say --- we know it works, and we fully support
>> versions Foo, Bar, Baz, but if you're using Fit, Bit, Ban, you're on
>> your own.
>
> I must say - Why ?
...
> at least I can't see why we should add some funny table with
> some "works, doesn't work" into our manual since well ... I think our
> manual is not structured well enough for users to find this kind of
> information easily.
My reason for suggesting this was that the difference between what
versions are supported/required might not be as easy as a boolean true
or false - despite what the PEAR installer & package.xml supports. :-)
> How about this compromise, we add 4.3.11 as min dep (latest 4.3
> release) and we throw in a recommend 5.2 ... Not sure what I'd want to
> do with 5.0, ideally I'd want to disallow all 5.0 except for the
> latest one - so we keep with the 4.3 schema ... we can observe the
> uptake of the newest PEAR release and how that reflects on the PHP
> versions being used, if people are actually upgrading or not, does
> that sound like a more acceptable solution for this PEAR release and
> perhaps the 4.4 and 5.0 exclusion for 1.9 ?
A quote - "You must do what you feel is right, of course."
--
Brett Bieber
http://saltybeagle.com/