Re: [PEPr] +1 for Web Services::Services_oEmbed
| From: | till | Date: | Mon, 13 Oct 2008 11:02:06 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: [PEPr] +1 for Web Services::Services_oEmbed | ||
| References: | 1 2 3 | Groups: | php.pear.dev |
| Request: | Send a blank email to pear-dev+get-50858@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
On Mon, Oct 13, 2008 at 11:21 AM, Alexey Borzov <borz_off@cs.msu.su> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> David Jean Louis wrote:
>>>
>>> But don't you want to wrap the cURL code in your last three packages into
>>> a standalone? Just curious!
>>>
>>
>> That's a real problem for pear 1, imho we need a PHP5 HTTP_Request2 that
>> can run with E_STRICT...
>
> Yeah, this point gets raised here quite often but nothing useful came of it
> yet.
>
> I even created a page for discussion of HTTP_Request2 on QuickForm2 wiki,
> but it didn't attract much interest, either:
> http://quickform.mamasam.com/wiki/doku.php?id=http_request2
>
>> I already throwed the idea on #pear without success ;)
>>
>> I know we need to concentrate on pear2 but maybe we could make a pear 1
>> version of the pear2::http_request or make a php5 clone of the pear1
>> HTTP_Request ?
>
> Direct clone of HTTP_Request is a bad idea, since its architecture is a bit
> messed up, while a rework to PHP5 with "drivers" (fsockopen, curl, others?)
> is feasible.
>
> Zend Framework has some good ideas and even the implementation in PEAR2 SVN
> has stuff to borrow.
>
> Of course we need a full unit-test suite, lack of that for HTTP_Request is a
> major problem in its development.
>
>> I willing to put time on it.
>
> Still willing after reading the stuff above?
Yes we are. :D