Re: [PEPr] +1 for Web Services::Services_oEmbed

Alexey Borzov a écrit :

Is this needed? As I'm a lead developer of HTTP_Request, I can register HTTP_Request2 on PEAR website. And also move current feature requests to it, hehe.

Well, registering the package (and before this, making a pepr) is one thing (the last step imho), setting up a temporary repo to enable people to start collaborate is another, no ?

First priority IMO is HTTP_Request2_URI class which will conform to RFC 2396 and use "official" regexps and algorithms from there. Original author of Net_URL(2) and HTTP_Request, unfortunately, isn't a very keen RFC reader. Then porting current HTTP_Request and adding cURL support.

I won't go in this kind of debates. Seems just flames to me. But imho making a HTTP_Request2_URI is just duplicating Net_URL2 package, if there are bugs in this package they should be fixed instead of making another package. -- David