Re: [PEPr] Changes in proposal for Configuration::Config_Lite
| From: | till | Date: | Fri, 24 Sep 2010 12:02:59 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: [PEPr] Changes in proposal for Configuration::Config_Lite | ||
| References: | 1 2 | Groups: | php.pear.dev |
| Request: | Send a blank email to pear-dev+get-53830@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
On Fri, Sep 24, 2010 at 1:47 PM, Patrick Engel <zenobic@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Patrick Engel (http://pear.php.net/user/pce) has edited the proposal for
> Configuration::Config_Lite.
>
> Change comment:
>
> * updated the Config_Lite Package (used pear to create it),
> * throws Exception, no dependencies,
> * $ phpunit AllTests.php works,
> * phpcs is still quite,
> * package validated
>
> * to run the phpunit AllTests.php, i used a "if Condition",
> like PHP_CodeSniffer.
I couldn't check it out - 404.
Do you have a github repo or similar?
Btw, I'd avoid dirname() etc.. in Lite.php. If you want to test if
you're running from a checkout or if you're installed through pear,
check if @package_version@ was replaced.
[You'll need a replacement task in package.xml.]
> Is it valid to test if it is installed,
> also in the Package's `Lite.php'?
>
> Should we better throw an Exception that inherits PEAR_Exception?
Last time this came up, someone said it's fine to use Exception or
SPL's exceptions.
Cheers,
Till