Re: Re: PECL != Siberia

On Thu, 2002-06-13 at 15:10, Michael Dransfield wrote: > OMG!!! > > Am I the only one who finds this a bit of a windows-esque way of doing things?? > > I can see orphan registries, unsatisfied dependencies etc... files floating > all over the place.. I would really like to put forward the suggestion that > pear should not be in the standard include path, but should be included > with its own command pear_include or something. This command should then > check that the requested module is in the registry, before including it.. > The checks could be done at start up, to prevent overheads when using pear > files. > > Sorry if this has already been discussed to death. I have RTFM and I would > like to search the list archives but the list search doesn't work. Don't worry, we are not Microsoft. The only Windows-esque thing about PEAR must be "registry", but try not to worry about that. At least I don't share your concern. - Stig -- Stig Sæther Bakken, Fast Search & Transfer ASA, Trondheim, Norway http://pear.php.net/wishlist.php/ssb