Re: Output_Cache Module

André Langhorst wrote: > > PEAR/Function_Cache would be nice, if the Shared Memory part of it > > wouldn't be so slow. It works nice without, but you don't get the real > > effect (cross-process) then. > > argh, I have mixed up the function cache with Ulf Wendels cache class - > which is NOT commited yet (but was announced on PEAR)... > we'll commit it as fast as possible... :) > sorry for the confusion There's some confusion here. I wrote some simple stuff to cache Image[GIF|JPEG|PNG] calls which I need for a <gtext> copy. This is far from the suggested Output_Cache and the Function_Cache Sebastian wrote. The Output_Cache sounds quite similar to what Björn Schotte introduced at his employer and it is somehow related to the Function Cache Sebastian wrote. I would like to see the Output Cache. We should check if we can write a generic base class for both attempts and have derived classes to provide the function and output control cache API. Ulf