Re: Request to add the SQL Server PHP extensions to PECL
| From: | Stig Bakken | Date: | Fri, 11 Feb 2011 06:59:11 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: Request to add the SQL Server PHP extensions to PECL | ||
| References: | 1 2 | Groups: | php.pecl.dev |
| Request: | Send a blank email to pecl-dev+get-7975@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
On Fri, Feb 11, 2011 at 6:50 AM, Antony Dovgal <tony@daylessday.org> wrote:
> Hello Ashay.
>
> On 02/11/2011 01:31 AM, Ashay Chaudhary wrote:
>> 1. Is the read-only a typo? No it's not a typo. We cannot take any contributions at
>> this time.
>> 3. Code-dump-on-release or not. This is a great question. We will start with the current
>> code for our latest release.
>> We are planning our next release; once we have our plans finalized we will be able to
>> communicate our source release cadence.
>
> Okay, so here is how it looks now:
> you want a read-only repository and most likely you're going to dump your code there just
> before the release,
> while still doing all the development in your private repository.
>
> In this case using PECL SVN makes no sense to me.
> I believe the greatest advantage of public repository is that other people can follow the
> development and
> point to possible problems, propose better solutions or even send patches.
>
>> We have received numerous requests from the PHP community to put this extension into PECL
>> and
>> this request is a direct response to that feedback. In addition to the extension source
>> code,
>> we are ready to include tests and documentation to PECL and actively maintain the project.
>
> That's all nice and good, but what difference would it make to anybody?
> Just leave it in your private repository until you get a permission to accept contributions and
> move your development to some public place (possibly PECL SVN).
>
> So I'd propose you to create a package in PECL so that people find you extension on
> pecl.php.net
> and possibly install it with
pecl install (though I'm not
> sure that'll work on windows),
> leaving the sources where they are right now.
It is possible to release pear/pecl packages with binary files in them.
Ashay, that would actually be a good option in this case, setting up a
channel server (pecl.microsoft.com or whatever) and host the packages
there until you are ready for a full community-style source release.
People would have to run "pecl channel-discover" first, that's all.
- Stig