Re: Request to add the SQL Server PHP extensions to PECL
| From: | Pierre Joye | Date: | Fri, 11 Feb 2011 14:01:06 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: Request to add the SQL Server PHP extensions to PECL | ||
| References: | 1 2 3 | Groups: | php.pecl.dev |
| Request: | Send a blank email to pecl-dev+get-7979@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
On Fri, Feb 11, 2011 at 2:55 PM, Gustavo Lopes <glopes@nebm.ist.utl.pt> wrote:
> Basically, this is a rejection of the Cathedral model. The Cathedral model
> may be outdated but saying it isn't "open" or is against free software
> principles is a non-sense.
I don't care about Free Software and I'm against GPL per se. So what
you say here, in my case, is totally irrelevant.
> I'd like to reiterate having (even read-only) projects in PHP's repository
> is beneficial because it allows us to keep track which APIs are used and how
> they're used.
Nothing prevents us to fetch latest release and analyze them, very
easy to do. But a read only repo in php.net won't happen.
Cheers,
--
Pierre
@pierrejoye | http://blog.thepimp.net | http://www.libgd.org