Re: [PHP4BETA] cvs: /php4 php.h /php4/ext/standard basic_functions.c basic_functions.h php3_string.h string.c /php4/tests testarray
| From: | Andrei Zmievski | Date: | Tue, 21 Sep 1999 03:11:30 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: [PHP4BETA] cvs: /php4 php.h /php4/ext/standard basic_functions.c basic_functions.h php3_string.h string.c /php4/tests testarray | ||
| References: | 1 | Groups: | php.version4 |
| Request: | Send a blank email to php-version4+get-4721@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
At 08:47 PM 9/20/99 -0400, Rasmus Lerdorf wrote:
>> I thought about this while driving home (it may or may not surprise you,
>> but I wasn't happy with the zend_ prefix either), and I think that going
>> for an informative prefix is the way to go. In this case, I'd go with
>> uf_*(), standing for User Function. That would give us uf_num_args() and
>> uf_get_arg().
>
>Perhaps just func_num_args()?
>
>uf_ is the sound you make when you get kicked in the groin.
Uff... All this could have been avoided if you guys (I'm talking to Zeev
and Andi) let us know your intentions of moving some functions over to
zend_builtin_functions.c so that we could discuss it. Something as imporant
as that warrants peer review, I would think. Now string.c is broken up
between two files, and we have to start worrying about possibly maintaining
two functions directories.
-Andrei