Re: [PHP4BETA] cvs: /php4 php.h /php4/ext/standard basic_functions.c basic_functions.h php3_string.h string.c /php4/tests testarray

From: Date: Tue, 21 Sep 1999 03:11:30 +0000
Subject: Re: [PHP4BETA] cvs: /php4 php.h /php4/ext/standard basic_functions.c basic_functions.h php3_string.h string.c /php4/tests testarray
References: 1  Groups: php.version4 
Request: Send a blank email to php-version4+get-4721@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message
At 08:47 PM 9/20/99 -0400, Rasmus Lerdorf wrote: >> I thought about this while driving home (it may or may not surprise you, >> but I wasn't happy with the zend_ prefix either), and I think that going >> for an informative prefix is the way to go. In this case, I'd go with >> uf_*(), standing for User Function. That would give us uf_num_args() and >> uf_get_arg(). > >Perhaps just func_num_args()? > >uf_ is the sound you make when you get kicked in the groin. Uff... All this could have been avoided if you guys (I'm talking to Zeev and Andi) let us know your intentions of moving some functions over to zend_builtin_functions.c so that we could discuss it. Something as imporant as that warrants peer review, I would think. Now string.c is broken up between two files, and we have to start worrying about possibly maintaining two functions directories. -Andrei

« previous php.version4 (#4721) next »