Re: [PHP4BETA] cvs: /php4 php.h /php4/ext/standard basic_functions.c basic_functions.h php3_string.h string.c /php4/tests testarray
| From: | Thies C. Arntzen | Date: | Tue, 21 Sep 1999 06:45:01 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: [PHP4BETA] cvs: /php4 php.h /php4/ext/standard basic_functions.c basic_functions.h php3_string.h string.c /php4/tests testarray | ||
| References: | 1 | Groups: | php.version4 |
| Request: | Send a blank email to php-version4+get-4724@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
On Mon, 20 Sep 1999, Andrei Zmievski wrote:
> At 08:47 PM 9/20/99 -0400, Rasmus Lerdorf wrote:
> >> I thought about this while driving home (it may or may not surprise you,
> >> but I wasn't happy with the zend_ prefix either), and I think that going
> >> for an informative prefix is the way to go. In this case, I'd go with
> >> uf_*(), standing for User Function. That would give us uf_num_args() and
> >> uf_get_arg().
> >
> >Perhaps just func_num_args()?
> >
> >uf_ is the sound you make when you get kicked in the groin.
i think func_num_args is far better that uf_num_args - reminds me of the
old times where symbol-length was an issue!
BTW: i know i repeat myself ... could we get some CVS-Mail from libzend?
tc
>
> Uff... All this could have been avoided if you guys (I'm talking to Zeev
> and Andi) let us know your intentions of moving some functions over to
> zend_builtin_functions.c so that we could discuss it. Something as imporant
> as that warrants peer review, I would think. Now string.c is broken up
> between two files, and we have to start worrying about possibly maintaining
> two functions directories.
>
> -Andrei
>
> --
> PHP 4 Beta
>
>
Thies C. Arntzen "One Big-Mac, Small Fries and a Coke!"
Digital Collections Phone +49 40 235350 Fax +49 40 23535180
Hammerbrookstr. 93 20097 Hamburg / Germany