RE: [PHP4BETA] cvs: /php4 php.h /php4/ext/standard basic_functions.cbasic_functions.h php3_string.h string.c /php4/tests testarray
| From: | Samuel Liddicott | Date: | Wed, 22 Sep 1999 09:01:02 +0000 |
| Subject: | RE: [PHP4BETA] cvs: /php4 php.h /php4/ext/standard basic_functions.cbasic_functions.h php3_string.h string.c /php4/tests testarray | ||
| References: | 1 | Groups: | php.version4 |
| Request: | Send a blank email to php-version4+get-4795@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Andi Gutmans [mailto:andi@zend.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, September 21, 1999 09:17 PM
> To: Samuel Liddicott; zeev@zend.com; Rasmus Lerdorf
> Cc: php4beta@lists.php.net
> Subject: RE: [PHP4BETA] cvs: /php4 php.h /php4/ext/standard
> basic_functions.cbasic_functions.h php3_string.h string.c /php4/tests
> testarray
>
>
> At 08:41 AM 9/21/99 +0100, Samuel Liddicott wrote:
> >Does Zend support any kind of packaging in order to keep
> different peoples
> >libraries in an accessable scope of their own?
>
> That was the main reason we introduced some kind of class support back in
> PHP 3.0. In order to allow ppl to create complete packages.
So maybe instead of prefixes we need some built-in system classes?
Sam