RE: [PHP-WIN] FAQ - PHP-WINDOWS
| From: | HKG) | Date: | Mon, 28 Apr 2003 15:00:26 +0000 |
| Subject: | RE: [PHP-WIN] FAQ - PHP-WINDOWS | ||
| References: | 1 | Groups: | php.windows |
| Request: | Send a blank email to php-windows+get-19671@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
> > Q: What would Jill do?
> > A: Read the archives before posting
>
> Eh? I don't understand what you mean. Are you slandering me?
Or it might be interpreted in the other way around.
> If you take the time to trawl through the archives, I think you'll find I've
> ASKED very few questions. Probably only one, if memory serves correct, and
> since my question concerned the possibility of my writing (in C++) a web
> server with PHP support to run on Windows CE, I didn't expect to find the
> answer in the archives.
Let me recall this statement about C++:
---8<------[SNIPP]-------
> From: Jill.Ramonsky@Aculab.com [mailto:Jill.Ramonsky@Aculab.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, February 18, 2003 3:03 PM
[...]
> I wouldn't be surprised if Visual C++ can't do it at all.
---8<------[SNIPP]-------
I assume that you are not aware of that an operating system
near your desktop is written in C++ then (e.g. MS WinNT)?
> However, I have ANSWERED many questions, so I think perhaps your comment is
> perhaps a little unjust. I may not have been on this list long, but I'm
> hardly a newbie so far as programming is concerned. I've been doing it for
> about three decades.
+30 years and you still doesn't know the limitation of C++? strange indeed....
> I only asked because I'm starting to think "Well, I _could_ answer that
> question, but I already answered it a few weeks ago so why should I
> bother?".
Yeah, right, so why care at all?
> I did NOT ask about a FAQ because I felt I needed to read one. I asked
> because I thought it might reduce the traffic on this list, that's all.
Does that traffic bother you that much really? A suggestion is to not
care about it, it ain't much to do about it, it has always been like
that and will probably always stay that way to.