RE: [PHP-WIN] FAQ - PHP-WINDOWS
| From: | HKG) | Date: | Mon, 28 Apr 2003 15:46:09 +0000 |
| Subject: | RE: [PHP-WIN] FAQ - PHP-WINDOWS | ||
| References: | 1 | Groups: | php.windows |
| Request: | Send a blank email to php-windows+get-19677@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
> From: Svensson, B.A.T. (HKG) [mailto:B.A.T.Svensson@lumc.nl]
> >
> > Let me recall this statement about C++:
> >
> > ---8<------[SNIPP]-------
> > > From: Jill.Ramonsky@Aculab.com [mailto:Jill.Ramonsky@Aculab.com]
> > > Sent: Tuesday, February 18, 2003 3:03 PM
> > [...]
> > > I wouldn't be surprised if Visual C++ can't do it at all.
> > ---8<------[SNIPP]-------
>
> And?
>
> I believe that the above quote was in answer to the following question:
> "Does anyone know how to start a PHP application through Visual C++ or
> C++?".
Nope.
> Do you think my answer to that question was wrong?
I don't think, I *know* the statement is incorrect.
> > I assume that you are not aware of that an operating system
> > near your desktop is written in C++ then (e.g. MS WinNT)?
>
> This is a very strange assumption for you to make. It is, however,
> completely incorrect, and I cannot for the life of me figure out where such
> an assumption came from. I am indeed aware that Windows NT is written in
> C++. (I'm not using Windows NT, by the way). In fact, it seems to me that
> your post is off-topic for the thread, and off-topic for this mailing list
> as a whole.
Frankly, I don't care if I am off topic. "I been writing so many helpfully
message in this list the last years so I deserve to be off topic from time
to time". Do you recognize the argument? ;) But I would not say that! I will
not argue in that way; but just claim I am an asshole, and will so be.
and if you don't like what I write, you are free to include me in your
kill file for either this thread or the entire mailing list if you so
feel fro it. Just like everybody else do.
> > +30 years and you still doesn't know the limitation of C++? strange
> indeed....
>
> I honestly haven't a clue what you are going on about. Perhaps you could
> help clear this up by explaining what you mean? For what it's worth, I do
> have a clear understanding of the limitations of both C++ and PHP, and I'm
> quite happy to share that information with anyone.
You statement was that you claimed that something could be done in Textpad,
but didn't thought it could be done in Visual C++. If you believe that something
can be done in TextPad but not in C++, then you might know a lot about TextPad
(more than me even) but not that very much about C++.
besides there are not principal limitations with C++, expect, but only maybe,
for the inherent limitations of Turing machines (this might be incorrect due
to emergent "behavior") rather the limitations are coopled with available
hardware resources and the experience of the programmer it self.
> > > I only asked because I'm starting to think "Well, I _could_ answer that
> > > question, but I already answered it a few weeks ago so why should I
> > > bother?".
> >
> > Yeah, right, so why care at all?
>
> Are you a troll?
No, but I am native form the very same country of the origin of trolls
(e.g. Scandinavia / North Europe). Does that make you more happy to
know all this?