Re: convention about function naming II
| From: | David Eriksson | Date: | Sun, 17 Dec 2000 18:48:15 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: convention about function naming II | ||
| References: | 1 | Groups: | php.dev php.qa |
| Request: | Send a blank email to php-dev+get-41684@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
On Sun, 17 Dec 2000, André Langhorst wrote:
> I have searched through almost all extensions and discovered the
> following things:
>
> [snip]
>
> c) I would suggest not to use very long function names to make people
> angry eg.
> "filepro","ingres","opensll","ovrimos","satellite"
> - I
> personally prefer using "fp","ingr","ossl","ovr" or
> "sat" is there any
> convention about this?
And I (as the author of Satellite) personally prefer to spell out
everything to make it as unambigous as possible... :-)
> [snap]
Regards,
-\- David Eriksson -/-
"An expert in a particular computer language is really an expert
in the work-arounds necessary to use this language to perform
useful work." - Richard B. Johnson