Re: Re: convention about function naming II

Also, there was some discussion a few months ago about normalizing all of the function names. We have a lot of functions that do not conform to the standard. IIRC, the discussion on the phpdoc list was to create a conforming alias for each non-conforming function and as time permits, document that the old names are deprecated. Then perhaps next major release or two - PHP 5 or 6 -the old names stop working. --zak ----- Original Message ----- From: "Jani Taskinen" <sniper@iki.fi> To: "Andi Gutmans" <andi@zend.com> Cc: "PHP Quality Assurance" <php-qa@lists.php.net>; "PHP Development" <php-dev@lists.php.net> Sent: Tuesday, December 19, 2000 4:45 PM Subject: [PHP-QA] Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: [PHP-QA] convention about function naming II > On Tue, 19 Dec 2000, Andi Gutmans wrote: > > >I really want these name changes to make it into 4.0.4 or we'll be left > >with backwards compatibility problems when releasing 4.0.5. > >Sascha, I think we should have one last RC. We will end up having to keep > >two versions of the function names which sucks. > > Shouldn't those socket extension's function names be changed too? > > --Jani > > > > > -- > PHP Quality Assurance Mailing List <http://www.php.net/> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: php-qa-unsubscribe@lists.php.net > For additional commands, e-mail: php-qa-help@lists.php.net > To contact the list administrators, e-mail: php-list-admin@lists.php.net >