Re: Re: convention about function naming II
| From: | eschmid+sic at s dot netic dot de | Date: | Sun, 17 Dec 2000 19:17:16 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: Re: convention about function naming II | ||
| References: | 1 2 3 | Groups: | php.dev php.qa |
| Request: | Send a blank email to php-dev+get-41688@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
On Sun, Dec 17, 2000 at 07:47:30PM +0100, André Langhorst wrote:
> > b) exif - read_exif_data (only one function)
> >
> > It will be more functions in the near future.
>
> shouldn't all these then be renamed to exif_* ? instead of
> write_exif_*, whatever?
I think, we have only one user and this is the author himself. Anyway it
is a not so a good example. We have "mysql_*", "ingres_*" and so on. We
can only have some discussions with the rest of the function names. For
MySQL we have the official function name "mysql_list_tables" but you can
use the old name "mysql_listtables".
-Egon
--
http://www.linuxtag.de/
http://php.net/books.php
http://www.concert-band.de/