Re: Woah
| From: | Joey Smith | Date: | Tue, 11 Sep 2001 20:08:41 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: Woah | ||
| References: | 1 | Groups: | php.dev |
| Request: | Send a blank email to php-dev+get-65793@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
It is no more obscure than a #define in a C file, which is the way this
construct is most commonly implemented...but, as I said, "I would rather
see [this]...than to see _() stay." I don't like it. But it is less
offensive to me than _() is...
On Tue, 11 Sep 2001, Hartmut Holzgraefe wrote the following to Joey Smith :
> Joey Smith wrote:
> > I would rather see something to the effect of "use strict;" (as in
> > perl) that can be defined (per site/directory/namespace/SOMETHING...)
> > to mean "use gettext on all calls to print" than to see _() stay.
>
> now tell me how *that* isn't obscure if you happen to be looking at
> some piece of code (maybe due to an error message with line number)
> without recognising this statement at the top ...
>
>