Re: CVS update: phpdoc

On Sun, 6 Jun 1999, Sascha Schumann wrote: > On Sun, Jun 06, 1999 at 05:38:41PM -0400, Jim Winstead wrote: > > On Jun 06, Sascha Schumann wrote: > > > The phpdoc module should be used only for PHP4 documentation, so > > > that we can prepare all necessary things for the first PHP4 > > > release (i.e. Zend information, new modules, other changes). > > > > > > Changes in the PHP3 documentation (php3/doc) should also be > > > reflected in the new module (phpdoc), if the changes apply to > > > PHP4 as well. > > > > This is a bad idea, because the docs are going to quickly drift > > out of sync unless someone volunteers to handle keeping them in > > sync. The same thing has certainly happened with the code. > > Read "changes" as "corrections." There won't be any big changes > in PHP3 anymore, so the status of the php3/doc will enter the > "stable" status. > > > I think we are at the point where we need to call the 3.x series > > feature-complete, and concentrate on getting PHP4 out into open > > beta as soon as possible. > > I agree. > > > Of course, this depends on Zeev and Andi saying that the Zend side > > of things is ready to "open wide", but I think we're approaching the > > time when they've said they would be ready for this. > > > > Jim > > > > -- > > PHP Development Mailing List (http://www.php.net/) > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: php-dev-unsubscribe@lists.php.net > > For additional commands, e-mail: php-dev-help@lists.php.net > > To contact the list administrators, e-mail: php-list-admin@lists.php.net I have no problems so far, but manual.ced can be .cvsignored. There are some problems with building the docs. I can see only a Makefile.in and a configure.in. Oh, and a html.dsl.in, a phpweb.dsl.in and a print.dsl.in. The phpweb.dsl.in isn't needed. Have a good night. -Egon