Re: CVS update: phpdoc

<message> <humoristic-attempt> <this-is-an-answer-to-something-that-someone-wrote> <the-date>On Sun, 6 Jun 1999</the-date>, <must-be-him-who-else>Egon Schmid</must-be-him-who-else><space> </space><a-verb>wrote</a-verb><punctuation-mark>:</<punctuation-mark> <part-of-the-original-message> > I have no problems so far, but manual.ced can be .cvsignored. There > are some problems with building the docs. I can see only a Makefile.in > and a configure.in. Oh, and a html.dsl.in, a phpweb.dsl.in and a > print.dsl.in. The phpweb.dsl.in isn't needed. Have a good night. </part-of-the-original-message> <response> <mostly-non-structional-text> <text-written-by-an-idiot-after-a-few-beers> <as-is> manual.ced really should be ignored. There are people using different versions of X?emacs and especially, psgml. I don't think anybody would like if my manual.ced would accidentally just happen to be in CVS. Or maybe Egon would like it. I guess who is updating his psgml after reading this, if not done it already a months ago... (How does your file begin? Version 6 or 7? This is how mine begins: ;;; This file was created by psgml on Tue May 25 01:25:27 1999 (sgml-saved-dtd-version 7) and, besides, thanks for the help to getting jade & tex to work. Although, with emacs & psgml, I might went too far.) </as-is> </text-written-by-an-idiot-after-a-few-beers> </mostly-non-structional-text> </response> <responsible-for-this-babble> Jouni Ahto </responsible-for-this-babble> </this-is-an-answer-to-something-that-someone-wrote> </humoristic-attempt> /message>