Re: [RFC] Arrow functions / short closures
| From: | Ben Ramsey | Date: | Wed, 13 Mar 2019 21:06:25 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: [RFC] Arrow functions / short closures | ||
| References: | 1 2 3 4 | Groups: | php.internals |
| Request: | Send a blank email to internals+get-104700@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
> On Mar 13, 2019, at 15:56, Rowan Collins <rowan.collins@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> I suggest you both read the RFC; about half the page is dedicated to summarising the syntaxes
> which have been considered, and the pros and cons of each.
>
> The summary of that syntax begins:
>
> > This is both the most popular and the most technically infeasible syntax.
I did read the RFC, and I could find no mention of f(), so I’ll rephrase my question. :-)
I would like to consider
Attachment: [application/pgp-signature] Message signed with OpenPGP signature.asc
f as a potential leading symbol instead of fn.
Cheers,
Ben
Attachment: [application/pgp-signature] Message signed with OpenPGP signature.asc