Re: [RFC] Arrow functions / short closures

From: Date: Thu, 14 Mar 2019 04:01:54 +0000
Subject: Re: [RFC] Arrow functions / short closures
References: 1  Groups: php.internals 
Request: Send a blank email to internals+get-104707@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message
I have two doubts about the RFC: 1. Your example with "($x) => $x" consider the use of "$x => $x", but not specifically "($x) => $x". I mean: maybe it can accept "($x) => $x" but not "$x => $x" because of the array conflict (as mentioned), and with that we avoid to create a new keyword "fn". So parentheses is required. 2. I don't remember. haha Em qua, 13 de mar de 2019 às 12:57, Nikita Popov <nikita.ppv@gmail.com> escreveu: > Hi internals, > > Motivated by the recent list comprehensions RFC, I think it's time we took > another look at short closures: > > https://wiki.php.net/rfc/arrow_functions_v2 > > This is based on a previous (withdrawn) proposal by Levi & Bob. It uses the > syntax > > fn($x) => $x * $multiplier > > and implicit by-value variable binding. This example is roughly equivalent > to: > > function($x) use($multiplier) { return $x * $multiplier; } > > The RFC contains a detailed discussion of syntax choices and binding modes. > > Regards, > Nikita > -- David Rodrigues

« previous php.internals (#104707) next »