Re: Re: [RFC] Arrow functions / short closures

@Benjamin Morel you must certainly have basic comprehension troubles; read me back; it is public; keep for yourself your emotional false projections to myself and infantile behaviors to yourself; I would never dare simply by following the basic rules of education; maybe english grammar should introduce a point of ironism; would help or not. You have a good day; thank you. On Thu, Apr 11, 2019 at 10:41 AM M. W. Moe <mo.mu.wss@gmail.com> wrote: > @Robert Hickman > > yes somehow that's a valid conclusion; however, I can walk and talk; it > does not > bother me at all; I like distractions. > > You have a nice day. > > On Thu, Apr 11, 2019 at 9:38 AM Robert Hickman <robehickman@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> @M. W. Moe If you don't like the java-isms you can ignore them to a >> large extent, which I do. However in doing so you're going against the >> grain and will end up writing a lot of stuff yourself. I do find it >> weird how PHP has morphed so drastically from it's origins and also >> wander why. If people wanted a Java-esque language, why not use Java >> in the first place? >> >> This discussion is off topic. >> >> On Thu, 11 Apr 2019 at 17:15, Benjamin Morel <benjamin.morel@gmail.com> >> wrote: >> > >> > > why? if voicing reasonable criticisms is bothering you; then you >> should >> > do something else in life; >> > > because engineering is built on this very >> > > concept; >> > >> > You're very welcome to challenge the "java impurities" that have been a >> > foundation of the language for 15 years—although you may better invest >> your >> > own time by switching to another language that's already closer to what >> you >> > expect. >> > >> > But calling people pigs when they disagree with you is not what I'd call >> > reasonable criticism. >> > >> > > I am not in the apex or any emotional trend; it does not interest me.. >> > >> > Oh that's exactly the impression you've left so far. >> >