Re: Re: [RFC] Arrow functions / short closures

On Thu, Apr 11, 2019 at 1:48 PM M. W. Moe <mo.mu.wss@gmail.com> wrote: > > @Benjamin Morel > > you must certainly have basic comprehension troubles; read me back; it is > public; keep for yourself your > emotional false projections to myself and infantile behaviors to yourself; > I would never dare simply by following > the basic rules of education; maybe english grammar should introduce a > point of ironism; would help or not. > > You have a good day; thank you. > Hello internals, I am ALL for academic discourse and constructive criticism. This value system has gotten many folks far in life and produces a better product, which I know we all want. However, mo.mu.wss@gmail.com's behaviour on this list is not the type of academic discourse or constructive criticism that inspires individuals to contribute and share their knowledge, in my opinion. mo.mu.wss@gmail.com: could you please temper your language to consider that a human is on the receiving end of your comments. Could you keep your comments within the realm of the RFC discussion-at-hand and away from personal or hyperbolic illustrative language? This RFC is really straight-forward and really, really well documented, prepared and presented. I perceive your hyperbole as a disrespect to the time of contributors to the project and to this thread. Please, temper your language. I hesitate to single you out (as there are other non-ideal behaviours; certainly on this list, but particularly in this thread), but in my opinion, you are the individual with the power to bring us back to a productive discussion. Thanks! -Dustin -- Dustin Wheeler | Software Developer NC State University mdwheele@ncsu.edu "If you don't know where you're going, it's easy to iteratively not get there."