Re: Re: [RFC] Arrow functions / short closures

@Benjamin Morel why? if voicing reasonable criticisms is bothering you; then you should do something else in life; because engineering is built on this very concept; I am not in the apex or any emotional trend; it does not interest me. You have a good day! On Thu, Apr 11, 2019 at 7:58 AM Benjamin Morel <benjamin.morel@gmail.com> wrote: > > yes php still suffers of > > it's java-like-transform; historically named php5; > > repeating the same design traps almost 20 years after it; > > Maybe you could just switch to another language then, and bother another > mailing list? > > > On Thu, 11 Apr 2019 at 16:51, M. W. Moe <mo.mu.wss@gmail.com> wrote: > >> @Stephen Reay >> >> i) Good for you!, if you say so must be the truth; yes php still suffers >> of >> it's java-like-transform; historically named php5; >> repeating the same design traps almost 20 years after it; and in the >> real-life the most interesting inquiries about the language evolution are >> blocked by this fact and make tedious what would look like very simple >> changes. >> >> ii) BTW, that's you making personal experience an absolute rule and >> projecting your own limitations as a valuable intellectual argument; , not >> myself; my remark was just an illustration. >> >> You have a good day! >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> On Wed, Apr 10, 2019 at 9:23 PM Stephen Reay <php-lists@koalephant.com> >> wrote: >> >> > >> > > On 11 Apr 2019, at 00:32, M. W. Moe <mo.mu.wss@gmail.com> wrote: >> > > >> > > I have never seen ML programmers being improductive; >> > >> > Great. I’ve never seen a pig crash a plane, therefore all pilots should >> be >> > pigs? >> > >> > Given your previous comments regarding removing “java impurities” it’s >> > hard to take anything you suggest seriously. >> > >> > >> > >> >