Re: Re: [RFC] Arrow functions / short closures
| From: | M. W. Moe | Date: | Thu, 11 Apr 2019 17:41:10 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: Re: [RFC] Arrow functions / short closures | ||
| References: | 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 | Groups: | php.internals |
| Request: | Send a blank email to internals+get-105249@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
@Robert Hickman
yes somehow that's a valid conclusion; however, I can walk and talk; it
does not
bother me at all; I like distractions.
You have a nice day.
On Thu, Apr 11, 2019 at 9:38 AM Robert Hickman <robehickman@gmail.com>
wrote:
> @M. W. Moe If you don't like the java-isms you can ignore them to a
> large extent, which I do. However in doing so you're going against the
> grain and will end up writing a lot of stuff yourself. I do find it
> weird how PHP has morphed so drastically from it's origins and also
> wander why. If people wanted a Java-esque language, why not use Java
> in the first place?
>
> This discussion is off topic.
>
> On Thu, 11 Apr 2019 at 17:15, Benjamin Morel <benjamin.morel@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >
> > > why? if voicing reasonable criticisms is bothering you; then you should
> > do something else in life;
> > > because engineering is built on this
very concept;
> >
> > You're very welcome to challenge the "java impurities" that have been a
> > foundation of the language for 15 years—although you may better invest
> your
> > own time by switching to another language that's already closer to what
> you
> > expect.
> >
> > But calling people pigs when they disagree with you is not what I'd call
> > reasonable criticism.
> >
> > > I am not in the apex or any emotional trend; it does not interest me.
> >
> > Oh that's exactly the impression you've left so far.
>