Re: Re: [RFC] Arrow functions / short closures

> yes php still suffers of > it's java-like-transform; historically named php5; > repeating the same design traps almost 20 years after it; Maybe you could just switch to another language then, and bother another mailing list? On Thu, 11 Apr 2019 at 16:51, M. W. Moe <mo.mu.wss@gmail.com> wrote: > @Stephen Reay > > i) Good for you!, if you say so must be the truth; yes php still suffers of > it's java-like-transform; historically named php5; > repeating the same design traps almost 20 years after it; and in the > real-life the most interesting inquiries about the language evolution are > blocked by this fact and make tedious what would look like very simple > changes. > > ii) BTW, that's you making personal experience an absolute rule and > projecting your own limitations as a valuable intellectual argument; , not > myself; my remark was just an illustration. > > You have a good day! > > > > > > > > On Wed, Apr 10, 2019 at 9:23 PM Stephen Reay <php-lists@koalephant.com> > wrote: > > > > > > On 11 Apr 2019, at 00:32, M. W. Moe <mo.mu.wss@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > I have never seen ML programmers being improductive; > > > > Great. I’ve never seen a pig crash a plane, therefore all pilots should > be > > pigs? > > > > Given your previous comments regarding removing “java impurities” it’s > > hard to take anything you suggest seriously. > > > > > > >